Australian Federal Court rules in flyash case
By Justin Oliver and Kathryn Finlayson
In a recent Federal Court decision, Justice Greenwood dismissed allegations that Cement Australia (Queensland) Propriety and Pozzolanic Enterprises Propriety, subsidiaries of Cement Australia Propriety, had misused their market power in acquiring flyash from power stations in south-east Queensland between 2002 and 2006, but found that several contracts for the acquisition of flyash over this period had the purpose and/or effect of substantially lessening competition.
The decision is consistent with earlier judgments on section 46 of the act (relating to misuse of market power), which have found that conduct that targets a rival can be excused if the conduct has a business rationale, such that it might be engaged in even in a competitive market.
What is perhaps more interesting are the findings under section 45 of the act…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.