Australia: accommodation is not a 'payment' — the Mammoet case
We have now had slightly more than a week to consider the effect of the Mammoet case (CFMEU v Mammoet  HCA 36).
In the Mammoet case, the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia, which held that the provision of accommodation to employees during a period of ‘protected industrial action’ would have constituted a ‘payment’ by their employer that was prohibited by s470(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Section 470(1) provides that if an employee engages in ’protected industrial action… the employer must not make a payment to an employee in relation to the total duration of the industrial action on that day’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper has released Issue 15 of its Real Estate Gazette, which focuses on the topic of sustainability.
Franchise systems have been, and continue to be, sought-after investment and acquisition targets.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies