Australia: accommodation is not a 'payment' — the Mammoet case
We have now had slightly more than a week to consider the effect of the Mammoet case (CFMEU v Mammoet  HCA 36).
In the Mammoet case, the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia, which held that the provision of accommodation to employees during a period of ‘protected industrial action’ would have constituted a ‘payment’ by their employer that was prohibited by s470(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Section 470(1) provides that if an employee engages in ’protected industrial action… the employer must not make a payment to an employee in relation to the total duration of the industrial action on that day’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The same day he took the reins as chief judge for the District of Delaware, Judge Leonard P Stark substantially overhauled his patent practices.
The purpose of this bulletin is to highlight the fact that certain real burdens will be automatically extinguished on 28 November 2014.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions