Australia: accommodation is not a 'payment' — the Mammoet case
We have now had slightly more than a week to consider the effect of the Mammoet case (CFMEU v Mammoet  HCA 36).
In the Mammoet case, the High Court unanimously allowed an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court of Australia, which held that the provision of accommodation to employees during a period of ‘protected industrial action’ would have constituted a ‘payment’ by their employer that was prohibited by s470(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).
Section 470(1) provides that if an employee engages in ’protected industrial action… the employer must not make a payment to an employee in relation to the total duration of the industrial action on that day’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has announced that its new $43.7m next-generation market surveillance system has become operational.
In this briefing, DLA Piper sets out a summary of key items of interest announced by the chancellor in the UK Autumn Statement.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
Our list of the summer’s big deals shows how London law firms kept busy with work from Asia as well as more familiar sources