Astrazeneca v XL Insurance A3/2013/0824
On 28 February 2013, we reported on the decision of Flaux J in Astrazeneca Insurance v XL Bermuda and Ace Bermuda, the first case in which the English courts had been asked to consider the proper interpretation of a ‘Bermuda Form’ policy.
The case concerned a claim by Astrazeneca Insurance, the captive insurer of the worldwide pharmaceutical company, against XL Bermuda and Ace Bermuda under a £133m layer of liability cover in respect of more than $800m (£490m) that Astrazeneca had paid to defend and settle claims made against it in the US and elsewhere in connection with its blockbuster drug, Seroquel…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the 7KBW briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from 7KBW
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from 7KBW
This complex and high-value multi-party commercial fraud dispute is due to come on for a four-month hearing before the Commercial Court in late 2016 or early 2017.
An English High Court boost for Hong Kong arbitration.