As new gTLDs near launch, what's happening and how can you protect yourself?
By Bobby Ghajar and Robert B Burlingame
While much of the world is finally getting a handle on the .com, .net and .org domains, we are on the brink of an explosion of hundreds of new generic top-level domains (gTLDs). In fact, if things go as planned, we will soon grow from the 22 current gTLDs to nearly 2,000 gTLDs.
Although exciting and intriguing, particularly in regard to how such gTLDs may change the way in which people use and navigate the internet, the current reality is that the new gTLDs are causing (and will continue to cause) significant expense for trademark owners regardless of whether such owners are participating in, or merely affected by, the new gTLD roll-out. Such expense is also exacerbated by the fact that many companies are unsure about the processes and effectiveness of objecting to new gTLDs or domain names registered thereunder.
ICANN, the organisation in charge of the new gTLD roll-out, accepted applications for new gTLDs from January through May 2012. The application fees were substantial (including an evaluation fee of $185,000 [£115,000] per proposed gTLD) and because the application details were not made public until 13 June 2012 (after the application period had closed) there was a great deal of anxiety and strategising within companies about whether they should suffer the expense of applying for new gTLDs or wait to see (and possibly oppose) what competitors had filed…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Aurora Energy decision deems discharges prohibited, leaves open question of permit shield applicability
On 3 September 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Alaska Community Action on Toxics v Aurora Energy Services LLC.
Scaling back considerably from the October 2012 term, the US Supreme Court issued only a few rulings affecting environmental law during the October 2013 term.