Are double derivative actions preserved?
By Adam Dowdney
In UPMS v Fort Gilkicker, the High Court had to decide whether common law recognises the concept of double derivative actions and, if so, whether they survived the coming into force of the Companies Act 2006.
The single derivative action is a longstanding principle of English company law. It was established by common law as an exception to the harsh rule in Foss v Harbottle that only the company itself had locus standi to bring an action in the company’s name. That meant that no action could be taken against directors where those directors controlled the company or could veto action on the company’s part against themselves.
Common law also evolved the derivative action principle to confer a right of action upon persons with the closest sufficient interest, allowing them to bring a claim on the company’s behalf — the so-called ‘double derivative’ action…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The government has unveiled the detail of proposed new legislation that will require companies to keep a new register of persons with significant control.
In the case of Hammersmith & Fulham v Monk, the defendant had been one of two joint tenants.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…