Are bank fees penalties? Paciocco v ANZ
On 5 February 2014, Justice Gordon handed down her decision in Paciocco v ANZ, concerning whether bank fees charged by ANZ (including credit card late payment fees and honour and dishonour fees) were penalties or otherwise unconscionable/unfair under relevant legislation.
Justice Gordon determined that credit card late payment fees charged by ANZ to Paciocco were penalties at both common law and equity and therefore unenforceable, but otherwise held that the overdraw honour fees, dishonour fees, non-payment fees and overlimit fees were not penalties or otherwise charged in contravention of the various statutory unconscionable conduct provisions.
Justice Gordon held that the quantum of the credit card late payment fees was extravagant (or exorbitant) and unconscionable in amount, and estimated that the actual damage suffered by ANZ in respect of each fee charged was only between AUD$0.50 and AUD$5.50 (depending on the specific fee), in contrast to the fees of AUD$35 or AUD$20 charged by ANZ. Accordingly, Paciocco was entitled to recover from ANZ the amount of the fee that was in excess of this…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Principals and contractors need to be aware that in not registering security interests under the PPSA 2009, they may risk serious consequences.
The New Companies Ordinance (NCO) will come into effect on 3 March 2014. It includes changes that affect the way documents may be executed.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shanghai’s ground-breaking Pilot Free Trade Zone could mark the beginning of the long-awaited liberalisation of China’s legal services sector.
Hong Kong IPO activity is hotting up again, but UK legal stalwarts are looking over their shoulders as US rivals make up ground fast