Arbitration Act 1996 section 42: neither a rubber stamp nor a licence to revisit
Section 42 of the Arbitration Act 1996 acts as an effective, although rarely used, mechanism to enforce a recalcitrant party to comply with an arbitrator’s peremptory order. But how deep into the merits of a peremptory order will a court delve before enforcing it?
In the recent case of Patley Wood Farm LLP v Brake and another, the High Court concluded that although section 42 gives the court discretion as to whether to enforce a peremptory order (i.e. an order that a party comply with a particular order by a deadline that has typically been set following the failure of a party to comply with a procedural order), a court is not required to revisit the merits of a tribunal’s decision to make such an order when exercising its discretion to enforce it.
This decision enforces the procedural nature of the court’s role in considering a section 42 application and should embolden parties to an arbitration to take recalcitrant arbitral opponents to court without fear that the court will review the merits of an arbitrator’s award or order…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.