Applications for pre-action disclosure — not such a high hurdle after all
The Court of Appeal has given clarification on the threshold that an applicant must meet in order to obtain pre-action disclosure.
Under rule 31.16 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court may make an order for pre-action disclosure only where: the applicant and respondent are likely to be the parties to subsequent proceedings; and the documents sought by the applicant would be covered by standard disclosure in subsequent proceedings (together the ‘jurisdictional threshold’) and pre-action disclosure is desirable for fairness, to assist in avoiding proceedings, or to save costs (‘discretionary test’).
In the case of Smith v Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Control  EWCA Civ 1585, the applicant had worked for the National Coal Board for 30 years, spending many of those years in a noisy underground environment. He believed that he had suffered noise-induced hearing loss as a result…
Click on the link below to read the rest of Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge & Co
Latest update on the European Commission’s investigation into possible state aid for the Hinkley point nuclear new-build project
The European Commission has decided to investigate alleged state aid by the UK into the nuclear new-build project at Hinkley point in Somerset. How has the UK responded?
John Coldham, design law expert at Wragge & Co, examines the recent reversal by the High Court of Trunki’s High Court registered design success.