Debevoise & Plimpton

Anti-corruption compliance in 2013: post-guidance trends and signals for the future

The publication in November 2012 of the Resource Guide to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), jointly released by the US Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), was followed by a mixed, but by no means insignificant, year in terms of the number of resolutions and size of recoveries, as well as new cases against individuals.

Although FCPA enforcement in 2013 was overshadowed in various ways by other types of enforcement actions against companies and individuals in an array of sectors, this hardly signifies a decline in anti-corruption challenges. Those challenges will likely continue long after enforcement arising out of specific historical events, such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the financial crisis, abates. The embedded risks of corruption in a broad swath of the world’s markets unfortunately are likely to guarantee this and may even lead to new enforcement records.

Despite the value of the guidance in outlining general principles, anti-corruption compliance challenges are likely to continue as US enforcement against companies continues to result in negotiated settlements or infrequently disclosed declinations that provide only limited insights into what the US enforcement agencies find significant. Anti-corruption compliance will also continue to present increasingly complex problems as cross-border M&A activity recovers from the financial crisis and as other nations’ enforcement — as illustrated by China’s crackdown on corruption and passage of new laws in Brazil and Russia — becomes more active. It is entirely possible that frustration by business interests, the public, Congress and the federal judiciary with the existing system of ‘regulation by settlement’ could result in FCPA enforcement being swept up in a larger legislative reform effort or in targeted amendments to the FCPA…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Debevoise & Plimpton briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below. 

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in

Register

It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer

 

Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.

 

Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.

 

Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Briefings from Debevoise & Plimpton

View more briefings from Debevoise & Plimpton

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • Shell

    Shell: taking the power back

    Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers

Browse This Firm’s

Overview

Old Broad St
London
EC2N 1HQ
UK