An overview of the new Security Interests Jersey Law
Taking security over shares, bank accounts, rights under contracts and other types of intangible property in Jersey is governed by the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012, which came into force on 2 January 2014. The law provides Jersey with a modern, efficient regime for the creation and enforcement of security interests in intangible property.
The principal changes introduced by the new law are that it provides for: hypothecation as a new method of taking security; taking security in present- and after-acquired intangible property, proceeds and book debts; securing obligations as to further advances; third-party security; a grantor to be able to retain power to deal with collateral without prejudicing the security interest; registration of security interests; and wider enforcement powers…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
The Cayman Islands’ Grand Court (Amendment) Law 2014 introduces the legislative clarification of the law providing for interim relief in aid of foreign proceedings.
The Court of Appeal has considered whether an employee who was unwilling to work out his notice period could treat the contract as at an end and work for a competitor.