An NHS Trust v Dr A
The Honourable Mr Justice Baker gave judgment in the case An NHS Trust v Dr A following a long process. The application was issued in January but the judgment was only published at the end of August 2013.
The judgment sets out the relationship between the Mental Health Act (MHA), the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and the court’s inherent jurisdiction to make orders in respect of individuals who may lack capacity, where they do not fall within the scope of the other two acts. It also urges caution with regard to the use of section 63 of the MHA to authorise treatment for physical disorder for patients detained due to mental disorder.
This case examines whether force feeding under the MHA can be permitted under section 63 and concluded that it could not in the circumstances of Dr A’s detention. Partly, this was because the treating trust did not ‘see food as a treatment for his mental illness’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
Mills & Reeve has released the December edition of its Health Legal Update.
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why