An apple a day: trademarks and phonetically similar words

By Carol Nyahasha

Apple opposed three UK applications of Ltd, relying on various UK and CTM word marks for the ‘apple’ word mark.

Each application was opposed on the grounds (i) that there existed a likelihood of confusion between the Apple and Wapple marks and (ii) that the Wapple marks would take unfair advantage and cause detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the Apple marks and (iii) of Apple’s passing-off rights. Apple also relied on the word ‘apple’ being a well-known trademark…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

  • Money 317

    Crunch boom

    Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of Lawyers: 860
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 79
Offices (Asia Pacific): 3