An apple a day: trademarks and phonetically similar words

By Carol Nyahasha

Apple opposed three UK applications of Ltd, relying on various UK and CTM word marks for the ‘apple’ word mark.

Each application was opposed on the grounds (i) that there existed a likelihood of confusion between the Apple and Wapple marks and (ii) that the Wapple marks would take unfair advantage and cause detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the Apple marks and (iii) of Apple’s passing-off rights. Apple also relied on the word ‘apple’ being a well-known trademark…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • merger deal

    Corporate crunch time: who will triumph at The Lawyer Awards 2014?

    As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014. 

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of lawyers: 860
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 4
No. of qualified lawyers: 67 (International 50)