Amazon and trademark infringement
Lush, the manufacturer and supplier of cosmetics and soaps and the proprietor of the Community trademark LUSH, has successfully claimed against the online retailer Amazon for trademark infringement.
The essence of the claim in Cosmetic Warriors Ltd v Amazon.co.uk Ltd was that if a consumer were to type in the word ‘Lush’ into the search box on Amazon, the search results would bring up a list of products that were not Lush products but that were products that Amazon hoped would interest a consumer searching for Lush products. The case also concerned Amazon’s use of the search term ‘Lush’ in Google’s Adwords service, Amazon having bid on the ‘lush’ keyword so as to trigger a sponsored link advertisement on the Google results page whenever a consumer typed ‘lush’ into the search box.
The High Court held that Amazon infringed the LUSH mark by using ‘Lush’ as a keyword within the Google Adwords service to trigger advertisements for the Amazon site, which included references to ‘Lush’. The court considered that the average consumer seeing the advertisement would expect to find Lush products on the Amazon site. In fact, Lush products were not available on the Amazon site…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Various amendments have been made to the Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.
A powerful collaboration of local authorities came together to launch APSE Energy on 11 June 2014 in Parliament.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents