All in it together? Large redundancy pool could have worked if selection had been fair
Contract Bottling Ltd v Cave arose out of a redundancy exercise conducted by a company that needed to make cuts in administration and accounts staff.
Unusually, the employer did not adopt a narrow pool for consideration; instead, it put together in one pool 10 employees whose job titles ranged from accounts manager to quality controller and warehouse manager.
A generic scoring matrix was applied, with the intention of dismissing four staff and keeping the other six whatever their function had been and retraining them as necessary. It was accepted that this might involve ‘bumping’ – if, for example, the quality controller had the lowest score, he would have been dismissed, even though the quality control function was still required; that function would then be reassigned to someone else…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The new Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622), which came into effect on 3 March 2014, is a substantial rewrite of Hong Kong companies law.
Employment News — 14 April 2014: the final straw — employer entitled to take strict view in light of previous warnings
Before his dismissal, the claimant in Disotto Food Ltd v Carlos Santos for misconduct he had been given three warnings about his conduct.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump
When a firm shouts loudly about a landmark merger, as SJ Berwin did when it joined forces with King & Wood Mallesons, departures are always likely to come under the spotlight.