AIFMD: private placement update
The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD), first proposed in early 2009 as part of the EU G20 commitment towards a secure and stable financial system, will soon be fully in force for EU fund managers and for non-EU fund managers marketing their funds into the EU. Any fund that is not regulated under the UCITS Directive is classified as an alternative investment fund (AIF) under AIFMD and its fund manager is classified as an alternative investment fund manager (AIFM). AIFMD fundamentally changes the rules for marketing anywhere in the EU of non-EU funds and funds with non-EU managers, introducing new transparency and disclosure requirements for these funds as well as new registration and authorisation requirements.
The implementation of AIFMD is subject to a transitional period that finally expires on 22 July 2014. EU AIFMs marketing EU AIFs will have access to an EU-wide passport to market these AIFs to professional investors. No passport will be available for AIFs managed by non-EU AIFMs or for non-EU AIFs managed by EU AIFMs until at least 2016. From the end of the transitional period, it will be necessary to comply with new national private placement regimes introduced under AIFMD to market such AIFs in the EU, except in cases of genuine reverse solicitation. National private placement regimes under AIFMD are implemented on a country-by-country basis — AIFMD imposes certain minimum requirements but individual EU member states can (and do) impose stricter or additional requirements. To comply with the private placement regime in an EU state, it is generally necessary to register the AIF with or obtain marketing authorisation for the AIF from the regulator in that country. In some jurisdictions, for example France and Germany, a lengthy prior approval process, stretching to as much as eight months, will be required to market by way of private placement. The need to go through this process may be commercially unappealing and cause significant interruptions to business…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Case supports the view that a claim for breach of statutory duty is possible in relation to a contract award by a public body beyond the scope of the procurement regulations.
Tools that can be used to: minimise the risk of disputes; formulate and respond to claims; and resolve disputes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all