Agency Worker Regulations — watch this space
By Russell Holland
On 1 October 2013, the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 will be celebrating their second birthday. In terms of case law, the regulations have not, as yet, featured significantly in a reported case. However, matters could change, with the TUC making a complaint against the government for failing to properly implement the regulations.
The TUC is particularly concerned about the ‘Swedish derogation’, complaining that ‘Swedish derogation contracts are just one more example of a new and growing type of employment that offers no job security, poor career progression and often low pay’. The CBI responded to the challenge commenting: ‘While businesses find the directive a nightmare to administer, the final deal carefully balanced the needs of businesses and employees — and the Swedish derogation is a key part.’
The CBI argues that ‘many firms prefer to pay an agency to provide temps using the Swedish derogation rather than face the bureaucracy involved with complying with the directive’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
How interesting: the public interest disclosure requirement of s.43B(1) of the Employment Rights Act
Not everything that may be interesting to the public is likely to be ‘in the public interest’. But is that a commonly held or understood view?
TUPE applies where a client decides to engage a new service provider instead of an existing one, but what if the client instructs the existing service provider to remove an employee from the contract before the TUPE transfer takes place?