Agency Worker Regulations — watch this space
By Russell Holland
On 1 October 2013, the Agency Worker Regulations 2010 will be celebrating their second birthday. In terms of case law, the regulations have not, as yet, featured significantly in a reported case. However, matters could change, with the TUC making a complaint against the government for failing to properly implement the regulations.
The TUC is particularly concerned about the ‘Swedish derogation’, complaining that ‘Swedish derogation contracts are just one more example of a new and growing type of employment that offers no job security, poor career progression and often low pay’. The CBI responded to the challenge commenting: ‘While businesses find the directive a nightmare to administer, the final deal carefully balanced the needs of businesses and employees — and the Swedish derogation is a key part.’
The CBI argues that ‘many firms prefer to pay an agency to provide temps using the Swedish derogation rather than face the bureaucracy involved with complying with the directive’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from No5 Chambers
Briefings from No5 Chambers
In P and Q v Surrey County Council & Others, the Court of Appeal approved Parker J’s suggested new ‘relative normality’ test for assessing whether or not someone was being deprived of their liberty.
Managing actual or potential conflicts of interest is essential for every professional.