Age discrimination — time for some revision
A recent Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment highlighted the way in which age discriminatory remarks can result in protracted litigation, whether or not they influence decision-making in relation to an employee (Clements v Lloyds Banking plc). Direct discrimination complaints have become increasingly rare. Most employers have strong equal opportunities policies, which are reinforced by training and other diversity initiatives. Even in the absence of such policies, the majority of employees will be aware that directly discriminatory comments are unacceptable, whether in the workforce or otherwise. The flurry of press reports that surface when TV celebrities make discriminatory remarks reinforces that position.
Discrimination complaints tend to arise from policies or practices which apply to all but have an adverse impact upon a particular protected group. So, while some managers might prefer their staff to work full-time, for example, it would be surprising for that desire to be accompanied by a directly discriminatory remark to a person making a flexible working request. Nevertheless, perhaps because age discrimination is a more recent concept here, we still come across cases where managers have got into difficulties for making comments about an employee’s age, particularly in the context of performance management. In 2012, a DWP report confirmed that age-related assumptions and stereotypes remain embedded in the UK. Medical research by Florida State University College of Medicine published this year also revealed that older adults who perceive discrimination on the grounds of age experience lower physical and emotional health than those who perceive discrimination on the grounds of sex, race or sexual orientation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
The Court of Appeal has overturned a High Court judge’s decision to add words to a non-compete restriction, which had originally offered the employer very little protection.
Relaxation of information and consultation requirements for micro-employers for transfers taking place on or after 31 July 2014
Regulation 13 of TUPE 2006 obliges employers to inform and consult with ‘appropriate representatives’ of the employees who are affected by the transfer.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?
The past five years have not been easy for Addleshaw Goddard. The firm’s revenue fell 7 per cent from £173.1m to £161.9m between 2008/09 and 2010/11 and despite finances looking up in 2011/12, when Addleshaws reported a 30 per cent increase in net profit, it has shown no notable compound growth in turnover since 2007/08.