Age discrimination and constructive dismissal — Clements v Lloyds Bank
C, in his fifties, was employed by the bank as head of business continuity. During a discussion with C’s manager regarding performance concerns in January 2012, C claimed his manager said to C: ‘You’re not 25 anymore’ a couple of times. His manager denied saying this. C resigned in July 2012 claiming constructive dismissal and age discrimination.
The Employment Tribunal (ET) agreed that there had been a cumulative repudiatory breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence on the part of the bank, in seeking to move C to another role without adopting any proper process, entitling C to resign. The ET also agreed that the manager had made the above-mentioned statement, agreed that the statement was an act of age discrimination, but stated it did not form part of the reason to move C to another role (the repudiatory breach relied on for the constructive dismissal).
C appealed against the ET’s finding in relation to the age discrimination point…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
James Lynas, a partner at Winckworth Sherwood specialising in education employment law, highlights easily avoidable human resources errors that can cost schools dear.
Name or shame: complying with the name and charitable status provisions of the Co-operative and Community Benefit Societies Act 2014
This note focuses on two key provisions of the Act which deal with the requirement to display the name and charitable status of registered societies.