Admissibility of covert recordings
G was employed by the bank until her resignation in January 2013. In April 2013, she lodged a claim at the employment tribunal, alleging sexual harassment, sex discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal.
Prior to her resignation, she attended a grievance hearing in November 2012 and a disciplinary hearing in January 2013. She recorded both ‘public’ and ‘private’ conversations connected with those hearings. The recordings were disclosed to the bank in July 2013. The bank objected to the use of the private contents of those recordings (but not to the use of the recordings of the public discussions at the hearings) as evidence in the employment tribunal. The private elements were discussions between members of the panel hearing the grievance, when G was out of the room, primarily during a break in the grievance hearing when the recording ran to 15 minutes. The private discussion to which the bank objected at the disciplinary stage was only some 30 seconds…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.