Accountability — April 2014: always a privilege (or maybe not)
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Rawlinson & Hunter Trustees SA and Ors v Akers & Anr  EWCA Civ 136 has highlighted the difficulties in establishing litigation privilege in relation to internal reports, particularly those obtained by liquidators.
In order for litigation privilege to apply to a particular document, litigation must exist or be in reasonable contemplation and the document must have come into existence for the dominant purpose of obtaining information or advice in connection with or assisting in the conduct of that litigation.
This decision arises out of the claim for damages brought against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) by the Tchenguiz brothers for allegedly unlawful raids, arrests and investigations. The issue before the court was whether five reports that had been prepared by a firm of accountants on the instructions of liquidators of a separate company were subject to litigation privilege. The judge at first instance, Mr Justice Eder, had concluded they were not. The Court of Appeal upheld his decision with Lord Justice Tomlinson giving the lead judgment…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Do employers, especially those employing professionals and people in positions of trust, need to do more due diligence than they might have previously carried out?
Firms carrying on consumer-credit-related regulated activity need to ensure they are complying with the requirements set out in the Consumer Credit Sourcebook (CONC).