ACCC declines to authorise common fee setting for ophthalmologists
By Kathryn Finlayson and Rachel Cox
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has decided not to grant authorisation to members of the Australian Society of Ophthalmologists (ASO) to reach agreements within shared practices as to the fees to be charged for ophthalmic services. The applicants were unable to demonstrate that public benefits arose from common fee setting rather than from the shared practice model or that common fee setting was an integral part of the model. The decision, on 19 September 2013, followed previous authorisations of common fee setting in shared practices of other medical professionals including general practitioners, dentists and ophthalmologists working for the Vision Group.
This case is a timely reminder to applicants that in order to obtain authorisation they need to show that there are real public benefits flowing not from the conduct generally but from the specific behaviour sought to be authorised…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
Full Federal Court rules that partly ‘aspirational’ grievance policy was contractual and criticises company's investigation
This decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court is another sharp reminder to employers about the need to ensure their policies do not inadvertently become contractual.
The Federal Court of Australia announced two further decisions that provide additional guidance to parties to a patent licence.