ACCC declines to authorise common fee setting for ophthalmologists
By Kathryn Finlayson and Rachel Cox
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has decided not to grant authorisation to members of the Australian Society of Ophthalmologists (ASO) to reach agreements within shared practices as to the fees to be charged for ophthalmic services. The applicants were unable to demonstrate that public benefits arose from common fee setting rather than from the shared practice model or that common fee setting was an integral part of the model. The decision, on 19 September 2013, followed previous authorisations of common fee setting in shared practices of other medical professionals including general practitioners, dentists and ophthalmologists working for the Vision Group.
This case is a timely reminder to applicants that in order to obtain authorisation they need to show that there are real public benefits flowing not from the conduct generally but from the specific behaviour sought to be authorised…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The High Court has handed down its decision in Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker — ruling that the implied term of trust and confidence is not part of Australian law.
How would an organisation handle the reinstatement of a dismissed employee while the matter is being heard?