ACA employer mandate delayed until 2015
On 2 July 2013, the Obama administration announced a one-year delay in the so-called ‘employer mandate’ under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The delay brings much-needed relief to employers who have been struggling with mountains of new guidance, and the need for yet-to-be-issued guidance, to meet the anticipated 1 January 2014 deadline.
Under the ACA, employers will be required either to provide minimum levels of health coverage to full-time employees and their dependents or to face the risk of paying penalty taxes that will subsidise the cost of employees’ premium tax credits for buying their own coverage on newly created health insurance exchanges. Employers and insurers must comply with information reporting requirements associated with the mandate, for which no guidance has yet been provided. The delay in the effective date will provide more time for the administration to try to streamline these requirements and for employers and insurers to implement the required reporting systems…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump