ABI publishes best-practice approach to lock-ups
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has published its recommended best-practice approach to lock-up agreements.
What is a lock-up agreement? On an initial public offering (IPO) or a secondary market placing, investors with significant shareholdings are asked to enter into an agreement not to sell, or to ‘lock up’ their shares, for a defined period, except in certain circumstances. These circumstances may be specified, or it may be left to the sole discretion of the investment bank to waive the lock-up obligation.
What has triggered the new guidance? The ABI considers that lock-up agreements have a significant market function by helping to regulate the supply of shares and stabilise the company’s share price. The ABI considers that lock-up agreements are being waived increasingly by investment banks before the stated expiry date, which it considers to be an ‘unwelcome development’. Consequently, it has recently published its recommended best-practice approach in relation to lock-up agreements…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump