A sobering lesson in planning enforcement
By Polly Reynolds
The recent Court of Appeal case of Ahmed v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government  EWCA Civ 566 offers a sobering lesson for local planning authorities on the need to consider all of the fallback options before issuing an enforcement notice.
The London Borough of Hackney issued a planning enforcement notice in respect of a property on Stoke Newington High Street, owned by Mr Ahmed. Planning permission had been granted in 2005 for a three-storey building on the site, with construction beginning in 2007 and completed in 2009. However, the building was not in accordance with the approved plans. Most notably, the building had four storeys rather than the three permitted.
The planning enforcement notice required Mr Ahmed to completely demolish the four-storey building…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories