A reminder from the EAT: appealing against a well-reasoned tribunal decision is unlikely to be successful
By Yvonne Gallagher
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has reviewed the approach to be taken by tribunals in determining employment status.
The case concerned a football referee who officiated at matches under the aegis of the Scottish Football Association. He was engaged under a contract that expressed itself to be one of self-employment and the tribunal judge concluded that this was correct, after careful review of the key terms.
She concluded that individual items that might be indicative of employment relationship, such as provision of private medical insurance, did not necessarily weigh heavily on identifying the true status of the relationship…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
The Treasury has issued a consultation document that clearly signals its recognition of the value to the UK economy of the private funds sector (including private equity and real estate funds).
Without prejudice communications with a regulator; collateral benefit and negligence; and more.