A new horizon for pre-claim conciliation
By Mugni Islam-Choudhury
Mugni Islam-Choudhury considers the new rules on pre-claim conciliation which become compulsory from 6 May 2014. On 6 April 2014 new rules come into force requiring employees intending on bringing a claim in the Employment Tribunal to first exhaust ‘pre-claim’ conciliation with ACAS.
On 6 May 2014 these rules become mandatory, so that an employee will not be entitled to bring a relevant claim at all, unless this process has been exhausted. Those with long memories will remember similar rules on a ‘fixed conciliation period’ that were abolished along with the statutory dismissal and grievance procedures. The new pre-claim conciliation process is quite different but has the same intent in reducing the number of contested tribunal claims.
The rules are contained in The Employment Tribunals (Early Conciliation: Exemptions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations SI: 2014/254, and they apply to ‘relevant proceedings’ as set out in section 18(1) Employment Tribunals Act 1996, and therefore apply to the main tribunal claims such as unfair dismissal and discrimination…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the No5 Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from No5 Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from No5 Chambers
A zero-hours contract is not a term of legal art, although a definition has been attempted in the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill.
Proprietary estoppel prevents the legal owner of property from asserting their strict legal rights in respect of that property when it would be inequitable to allow him to do so.