A ‘need’ for golf courses
The case of R (oao Cherkeley Campaign Limited) v Mole Valley DC and Anr is a very interesting read and provides a useful source of guidance on the meaning of ‘need’, as well as considering the point as to whether the explanatory text supporting a policy is saved’ when the policy itself is saved.
On that latter point the answer was ‘yes’. The case involved the grant of planning permission for a ‘five-star’ golf course and additional facilities in Surrey. The application site benefitted from just about every special designation available including green-belt status. Notwithstanding a strong officer recommendation for refusal, members decided to grant…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why