A guide to buying a flying freehold apartment in Jersey
The ‘Loi (1991) sur la copropriété des immeubles bâtis’, also known as the ‘Flying Freehold Law’, was enacted to enable units (usually apartments) within buildings to be sold on a freehold basis instead of by share transfer. We will assume for the purpose of this briefing that we are dealing with an apartment.
The law provides for the division of a property (the ‘collective property’) into private units and common parts. Ownership of a private unit (an owner in this case being known as a ‘co-owner’) grants outright freehold title to an apartment (and, where relevant, of any garden, patio, parking space or store).
A co-owner is also allocated a percentage interest in the common parts (i.e. the structure of the building, shared access ways and commonly used facilities) and is required to contribute towards their maintenance and upkeep…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ogier briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ogier
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ogier
Clients from forced heirship jurisdictions can establish an offshore trust that will be defended by the court.
Court confirms that beneficiary’s proper route to challenging fiduciary’s costs lay in challenging the trustee’s agreement.