A fashionable month for trademarks — Jack Wills v House of Fraser and Maier v Asos
In the first case, Jack Wills Ltd v House of Fraser (Stores) Ltd, the issue was whether House of Fraser’s use of a pigeon logo on clothing infringed Jack Wills’ registered trademark, also used on clothing. The Jack Wills logo comprises a silhouette of a pheasant with a top hat and a cane. The allegedly infringing mark features a silhouette of a pigeon in a top hat, albeit facing in the opposite direction to the first mark.
It is common nowadays for clothing companies to adopt logos as part of their branding — think of Lacoste or Ralph Lauren, for instance — and it is common also for such logos to be registered as trademarks.
Arnold J considered that House of Fraser’s adoption of the ‘pigeon logo’ was a branding decision. He also considered that, even if there had been no deliberate copying, the designer of the House of Fraser pigeon logo may have been subconsciously influenced by the Jack Wills’ pheasant logo…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Southend-On-Sea Borough Council v Armour is a tenancy repossession case in which the tenant invoked a successful article 8 defence.
The draft Equality Act 2010 (Equal Pay Audits) Regulations 2014 are due to come into force on 1 October 2014.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents