A bumpy ride for Hyundai Motor Company over use of EON trademark
Hyundai Motor Company filed a UK trademark application for the words Hyundai EON, which E.ON AG opposed on the basis of its existing community trademark registration for the word E.ON in stylised form. E.ON claimed, among other grounds, there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks.
In comparing the two marks, the Hearing Officer cited the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision in Medion where the court acknowledged that a likelihood of confusion can arise from use of a composite mark that is partly comprised of an earlier identical mark — if that earlier mark had an independent distinctive role in the composite mark. The earlier sign need not necessarily constitute the dominant element of the composite mark.
The hearing officer had found that the word EON in Hyundai’s trademark was a distinctive element that retained an independent distinctive role and found in favour of E.ON that there was a likelihood of confusion…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
The Düsseldorf Court of Appeal has referred questions to the CJEU on whether the supply of patent-protected substances by a third party to a generic company is covered by the Bolar exemption.
This is only the second time that the Data Protection Index has featured in Global Intellectual Property Index, yet a number of trends are already apparent from the results.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world
Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town