A bridge too far? HMRC rules that bridge is a game, not a sport
In a decision that will have members of the English Bridge Union choking on their morning Jaffa Cakes, HM Revenue & Customs has ruled that bridge is a game, not a sport.
While you may consider that the English judicial system could spend its time on more weighty matters than the categorisation of popular pastimes, the distinction has important implications.
The English Bridge Union has annual competition entry fees of more than £600,000. If bridge is classified as a sport, not a game, then it would be able to reclaim the (not insignificant) VAT on those fees. Other pursuits, such as darts, croquet and billiards, have all benefited from being classed as sports for tax purposes, even if they are yet to feature at the Olympics…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Gateley briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Gateley bigshots see personal wealth soar on flotation, but face penalties for early exit .
Gateley is to float on the London Stock Exchange, becoming the first UK firm to list itself as a public limited company. But why would a firm would look to float, and what it could mean for the industry?