A break for tenants? Break options and rent refunds
Sometimes it’s hard to be a tenant. A bit of tough negotiation on the commercial lease grant has secured you a break option. Midway through your lease term you look to exercise that option only to be faced with a myriad of preconditions. Your lease could contain conditions of vacant possession; payment of rents; no material breaches of covenants. There are plenty of bear traps to keep you standing by your landlord.
Recent case law certainly hasn’t helped the tenant. A recurrent issue has been break dates falling part way through a rental quarter and the question of overpayment of rent. The case of Canonical UK Ltd v TST Millbank LLC  adopted a very strict approach to break payment conditions. It interpreted a condition requiring payment of rents up to the break date as requiring payment up to the next quarter day, despite the break date falling prior to it.
The court held that the condition did not vary the tenant covenant to pay the full quarter’s rent in advance. It also held that without an express provision there was no requirement for the landlord to reimburse the tenant for the overpayment of rent from the break date to the next quarter day. And so the recent High Court case of Marks & Spencer v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd  EWHC 1279 (Ch), which seemingly rowed back from that high water mark of strictly applied conditions, has been welcomed by tenants’ representatives. It too considered the issue of a tenant break part way through a rent quarter…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Collyer Bristow briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Collyer Bristow
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Collyer Bristow
Stephen Critchley and Robert Andrews describe what the alleged manipulation is; who may have suffered from it; and the ongoing investigations into it.
In Prophet plc v Huggett, the High Court came to the surprising decision that it could reword a badly drafted restriction in an employment contract.