A 360-degree look at secondment tax issues: China and the US
By Roberta Chang
In this article, Roberta Chang discusses the recent guidance issued by the Chinese State Administration of Taxation on when a foreign company’s secondment arrangement into China will be deemed to have created a taxable presence. Christine Lane and Gene Magidenko comment on how the Chinese regulations on cross-border secondment arrangements differ from those under US tax laws.
When structuring cross-border secondment arrangements, a foreign company dispatching the secondee (the Home Country Entity) to a company in China (the Host Entity) will typically maintain its employment relationship with the secondee in order to: prevent the application of PRC employment law (which is generally more employee friendly) and; preserve the secondee’s participation in their home country benefits.
However, focusing on these goals exposes the arrangement to the risk of the Home Country Entity being deemed to have a permanent establishment (PE) in China.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump