65 million reasons never to suffer in silence — KSF (in administration) v UBS
The Commercial Court (Andrew Smith J) has recently handed down judgment on an intriguing battle between UBS and Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (in administration) (KSF) (the English subsidiary of the failed Icelandic bank Kaupthing hf, or Khf), in relation to the fate of $65m (£39m) mistakenly paid by UBS to Khf in the first days of the financial crisis.
The judgment contains a number of instructive points both for banks and for their lawyers, but its practical assistance for the former must be in illustrating how an estoppel can arise where payments are misdirected and, by implication, how to avoid that happening. Along the way, the judgment also contains interesting conclusions on the meaning of ‘payment’ in the ISDA Master Agreement.
UBS and KSF entered into a foreign exchange transaction (the FX trade), pursuant to which UBS was to pay $100m to KSF. The dispute related to $65m of that sum, which UBS transferred by SWIFT to JP Morgan on 3 October 2008. Unfortunately, UBS’s (mistaken) instructions to JP Morgan were to credit the sum to an account of Khf, rather than KSF…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
‘Inversion’ transactions are nothing new, and the current proceedings appear to be just another replay of earlier games of tag between the government and US multinationals.
In Devon Canada Corporation v The Queen, the issue is whether the taxpayer may deduct $20,884,041 paid to cancel issued stock options.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.