65 million reasons never to suffer in silence — KSF (in administration) v UBS
The Commercial Court (Andrew Smith J) has recently handed down judgment on an intriguing battle between UBS and Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (in administration) (KSF) (the English subsidiary of the failed Icelandic bank Kaupthing hf, or Khf), in relation to the fate of $65m (£39m) mistakenly paid by UBS to Khf in the first days of the financial crisis.
The judgment contains a number of instructive points both for banks and for their lawyers, but its practical assistance for the former must be in illustrating how an estoppel can arise where payments are misdirected and, by implication, how to avoid that happening. Along the way, the judgment also contains interesting conclusions on the meaning of ‘payment’ in the ISDA Master Agreement.
UBS and KSF entered into a foreign exchange transaction (the FX trade), pursuant to which UBS was to pay $100m to KSF. The dispute related to $65m of that sum, which UBS transferred by SWIFT to JP Morgan on 3 October 2008. Unfortunately, UBS’s (mistaken) instructions to JP Morgan were to credit the sum to an account of Khf, rather than KSF…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
‘Zero tolerance’, automatic suspension approach to safety violations criticised, written warning substituted
Employers are increasingly taking a ‘zero tolerance’ approach in which a minimum level of discipline — whether a suspension or dismissal — is imposed for certain serious safety violations.
DECC has confirmed that there will be a further year-long grace period for large-scale solar PV projects which fail to be accredited under the Renewables Obligation (RO) by 31 March 2015.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive