26-week qualifying period for unfair dismissal to remain
Following public consultation in respect of the qualifying period for protection against unfair dismissal, the Employment Forum has recommended that the existing qualifying period should remain at 26 weeks. The minister for social security has accepted the forum’s recommendation and will not be proposing an amendment to the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003.
In reaching its conclusions, the forum considered opinions from 25 respondents from various backgrounds. Some of those who responded were in favour of an increase to the qualifying period because, in their view, the current period deters employers from employing staff and creating new jobs as a result of perceived risks of complaints to the Jersey Employment Tribunal and the burden of such complaints on businesses. Others commented that as there were no qualifying periods imposed for other employment-related rights (such as discrimination or breach of contract claims) there was no reason why the existing unfair dismissal qualifying period should be increased…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mourant Ozannes
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
Jersey Court of Appeal confirms rights of non-trustee fiduciaries to an indemnity out of the trust fund
On appeal from the Royal Court, the Jersey Court of Appeal held that a fiduciary in relation to a trust had an identical right of indemnity in equity out of the trust fund as a trustee.
The interpleader proceedings in Guernsey are dealing with substantial assets claimed to be the proceeds of a fraud alleged against Nikolai Battoo and the BC Capital Group.