Employment law 2013 review: employment status
The controversial concept of ‘employee shareholder’ employment status was a hotly fought point in the game of ‘ping pong’ between the House of Commons and the House of Lords during the passage of the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013. Ultimately, the government-backed provision made its way onto the statute books and came into force on 1 September.
Basically, individuals can receive shares with a value of at least £2,000 in return for giving up certain employment rights, most notably the right to claim a statutory redundancy payment and to claim unfair dismissal (except in health and safety cases, automatically unfair cases or cases where the dismissal is discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s employment &and equalities experts bring you the latest developments that may affect your business – what they are, an
The Court of Appeal looked at when a public body is required to appoint new decision makers where a decision has been held to be unlawful and is remitted to the body to be retaken.