For-profit educator’s business model under scrutiny

Peter Crisp
BPP Law School’s long-term goal of transforming itself into a full-blown university could be in jeopardy thanks to its US parent Apollo Group being investigated by the SEC in connection with accounting irregularities.
The probe, which Apollo claimed is an “informal inquiry”, is the second time the group has been put under the SEC’s microscope for its revenue recognition policies.
Although full details of the investigation are not known, it is understood that it relates to the way Apollo accounts for revenue relating to students enrolling at the University of Phoenix who are refunded for dropping out early. The University of Phoenix is the largest for-profit educator in the US.
In a separate case, the university is embroiled in an $80m (£48.06m) pay dispute with staff. Also, it is understood that in 2004 Apollo paid out nearly $10m to staff after it allegedly broke the law by tying their remuneration to student enrolments.
In a statement Apollo clarified that it is attempting to settle and resolve a six year old False Claims Act lawsuit — in which the US Department of Justice declined to intervene - relating to its compliance with a single provision of the Higher Education Act. The previous $9.8m settlement was with the US Department of Education to resolve similar allegations.
BPP chief executive Peter Crisp said in a statement: “In its fourth-quarter and year-end results statement [issued 27 October 2009], Apollo Group announced its full cooperation with the SEC on an informal inquiry into one area of its accounting practices. The inquiry relates to Apollo’s US operations only and not BPP, which remains a UK company subject to UK legislation.”
However, rival LPC providers in the UK claim the probe raises major concerns about BPP’s longer-term plans to achieve university status.
BPP became the first privately owned company to receive degree-awarding powers in September 2007 and has since launched an undergraduate law degree that attracted 100 students in its first year.
College of Law chief executive Nigel Savage said: “This raises serious issues if Apollo’s US tactics are being embraced by its UK subsidiary.
“I want to know if they [BPP] are playing by the rules of the jungle, or are the regulators going to embrace a more robust system of compliance. If so, that’s not a job for worthy academics or worthy practitioners, this is about hardnosed compliance.
“Otherwise we’re going to finish off with a legal education model like the banking system.”
The course director at another LPC provider argued that this raised issues about who is keeping an eye on the ownership of UK degree-awarding institutions.
“We need to be absolutely sure that quality is being assured,” he stated.
Readers' comments (6)
IHateBPP | 23-Nov-2009 1:34 pm
They ripped me off by £1000 for a sub-standard service when I did one module of their GDL.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 23-Nov-2009 1:40 pm
Hardly a surprise BPP might be in hot water here. It makes loads of mistakes - including giving its students completely inaccurate exam results, as it did to me last year! For a law school, it really needs to work on its due diligence levels.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Dazed and confused | 23-Nov-2009 2:38 pm
It seems to me that the school have been constantly in the bad books recently - first the oversubscription of its BVC then the exam result mistake...... It seems Apollo is already dragging the good name of BPP down.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Nov-2009 11:05 am
I think the SRA should bring back the grading system they used for LPC providers. With all the new courses being introduced I don't see how they are going to monitor quality!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Nov-2009 3:38 pm
If BPP hasn't been engaged in the same 'unusual' accountancy practices as Apollo then it can't trust its American parent company. Either way Its students will end up losing out.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 25-Nov-2009 4:23 pm
What will be the implications for the BPP? Will it still be able to function here? And will it be taken over by another company?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment