BLG chief exec: Clydes deal is no rescue merger
Potential merger would ’destroy the competition’ in insurance sector
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert (BLG) chief executive David Jabbari has refuted claims that the firm has been forced into a potential merger with insurance rival Clyde & Co (3 June 2011), despite sources claiming that the firm had no option but to agree to the deal.
While Jabbari said the discussions with Clydes proved his firm was “bold and innovative”, he stressed that at this stage the merger is not a done deal.
“BLG has a variety of options in pursuit of its strategy of growth in its core markets in the UK and internationally,” he said.
That said, a source close to the firm claimed that a weakened international presence and collapsing rates in the domestic insurance sector, particularly in the commoditised market, meant the firm was strategically “backed into a corner”.
The assertion is backed up by other senior ex-BLG partners, who said the firm’s management had told partners earlier this year that the firm would cease to exist as an independent entity by the end of the 2011-12 financial year.
One said: “My understanding is that the partners have been alerted that the firm needs a merger because it can’t regroup and rebuild.”
Outside perceptions are that any union would be a takeover by Clydes rather than a merger of equals. Financially there is a large disparity between the two firms’ profitability, with BLG’s average profit per equity partner (PEP) figure for 2010-11 estimated to be around £300,000, while Clydes’ figure for 2009-10 was £605,000. It is understood that this could result in a number of BLG’s equity partners being demoted to salaried status in any merged entity.
In turnover terms, however, the deal would be transformational in the insurance sector. Based on figures for 2010-11, the combination would result in a firm with a revenue
of £306.5m, giving it a sporting chance of entering the UK top 10 and, as a BLG insider said, “destroying the competition”. Rival Holman Fenwick Willan posted a revenue of £112.5m in 2010-11, while Kennedys’ turnover for 2009-10 was £88.2m.
A partner at a rival firm said: “It’s a seismic move that will have consequences for all firms in the insurance market.”
The deal would give Clydes an instant domestic network, while BLG would gain access to Clydes’ network of 22 international offices.
In addition, Clydes would pick up BLG’s highly respected professional indemnity team, led by Sarah Clover, and the bulk insurance practice recently acquired from defunct
firm Halliwells.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page
Readers' comments (24)
Rival Insurance Practice | 6-Jun-2011 9:56 am
Destroy the competition, I somehow think not. The conflicts will generate a lot of work for other practices in the area and cost-conscious insurance clients will be wary of hiring a "top 10" practice, as they know they will be gouged on fees. Truth is Barlows need this "merger" and their cocky young management is about to get its come-uppance.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 6-Jun-2011 11:04 am
"Destroy the competition"? 25% share of supply test triggered?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Opportunity knocks | 6-Jun-2011 11:25 am
I disagree with you rival insurance practice @0956.
For the EC3 firms this deal, if successful, will remove a major competitor for the market in a sector which is already being squeezed by falling fees.
There will no doubt be plenty of fallout through conflicts and this will present opportunities for rival firms looking for new teams to help them get into the market.
The insurance sector has for too long be dominated by the sames firms, this should give everyone a shock
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Wrong direction? | 6-Jun-2011 11:33 am
In light of the consolidation of the market which is going on it’s probably a good defensive move, but it’s a real shame considering where BLG could have taken the business.
I question whether having a litigation and insurance boutique is the right way forward. The right strategy would have been to build up a stronger commercial and corporate side because it’s so integral to the way their clients are doing business.
Both firms have a certain level of work but if you want to do well you have to be going for those high progile City transactions.
Nobody goes to BLG for any serious insurance merger because they have not got the resources, and they probably would not go to Clydes either.
Will there be enough litigation to ensure the survival of a merged £300m firm? Maybe not.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Selling up | 6-Jun-2011 11:39 am
BLG could have and should have gone for the US merger, this just looks like a firesale now
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 6-Jun-2011 12:12 pm
They’ve got to bridge that PEP gap, either by making BLG people salaried, or getting rid of them. Because it’s a takeover Clydes would be in a position to sort that out. For Clydes to take out one of their main competitors, get their hands on the professional liability practice and a strong bulk practice, opportunities like that don’t come around very often.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 6-Jun-2011 12:20 pm
My money would have been on BLG merging with a US firm. You need international offices in order to attract the work, that is one of the attractions of Holman Fenwick. For BLG, too many exits, too few international offices and low rates mean there is nowhere else to go.
All credit to David Jabbari. If this goes ahead it will be a major coup for the firm and will create a new force in the law.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 6-Jun-2011 2:18 pm
Wonder who'll be senior partner.....
Surely this must be Michael's last toot at the trumpet?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
White Flag | 6-Jun-2011 2:56 pm
David Jabbari's spin never ceases to amaze me.
Everyone connected with BLG saw the writing on the wall ages ago, and this is emphatic confirmation that the end is nigh. For "pursuing growth strategy" read "salvage from the wreckage of a failed firm".
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 6-Jun-2011 3:07 pm
I'm sure other firms will already be circling for possible hires. Bet BLG's standout practices will be high on the list!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment