The Lawyer Global Litigation Top 50 report is the only ranking of international law firms by litigation and arbitration revenue and is essential reading for anyone seeking to benchmark their litigation and dispute resolution practices...
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
An investigation into law firm billing has revealed that in-house counsel are being left in the dark by law firms and are disillusioned with billing methods.
An investigation into law firm billing by in-house lobbyist C&I Group and consultants BDO Stoy Hayward has revealed that in-house counsel are being left in the dark by law firms and are disillusioned with billing methods.
Ninety-four per cent of respondents stated that there was no certainty over the final cost of a bill with 82 per cent stating that there were no incentives for firms to be quick and efficient.
Colt Telecom legal, regulatory and commercial director Robin Saphra commented: “There is no transparency. You just tend to get a bill on your desk.”
Hourly billing is still the prevailing method of billing despite being rated as the least satisfactory by in-house lawyers. An overwhelming 97 per cent of in-housers were billed by the hour during the last 12 months with only 10 per cent opting for value-based fees.
“Some firms are risk averse from hourly billing,” said Saphra, adding that Colt had recently piloted a fixed fee method.
The report also showed that two-thirds of in-house lawyers were willing to incur higher fees for high-value work if they were able to pay less for lower value work.
CMC Markets global general counsel Dominic Bacon said: “I use hourly billings for most of my transactions but have an up-front discussion about what the work is likely to entail and what the costs are likely to be - so hourly rates become more of a measure than a fixed rate.”
He also explained that there is commonly no certainty over costs but this is usually because of the lack of certainty over the work.
“Negotiations over a settlement or an acquisition can be simple or protracted depending on the other parties involved,” he said.
171 in-house lawyers were interviewed. The C&I Group is looking to create a “tool kit” to deal with billing after analysing its findings.
Billing methods used in last 12 months Hourly rate - 97 per cent Fixed fee - 66 per cent Success/conditional fee - 13 per cent Capped rate - 42 per cent Value-added fee - 10 per cent
Which alternative billing method is best? Value-based - 10 per cent Success/conditional fee - 4 per cent Capped fee - 13 per cent Fixed fee - 22 per cent None of these - 4 per cent Combination of methods - 47 per cent