The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The former auditors of collapsed bank BCCI have settled a six-year-long $11bn liquidators' claim against them by paying just $195m.
Lawyers close to the deal estimate that at least a quarter of the $195m ($50m) will have to pay the fees of the liquidators and their lawyers Lovell White Durrant. Legal fees over the six years - shared between Lovells and counsel - are likely to top $100m. Liquidators fees will account for at least another $240m.
But liquidators and lawyers have managed to recover over $4bn for creditors, representing 46 per cent of the amount creditors lost in the collapse.
Following BCCI's 1991 collapse, the liquidators, Deloitte & Touche and Baden & Baden in Luxembourg, sued Price Waterhouse and Ernst & Whinney, which were auditors of the bank at different times. They also sued the Abu Dhabi government which had a majority stake in the bank.
Russell Sleigh at Lovell White Durrant advised the liquidators. Price Waterhouse instructed Herbert Smith partners Sonya Leydecker and Christa Band while Ernst & Young (as it now is named) used John Turnbull at Linklaters. Paul Phippen at Macfarlanes advised Abu Dhabi.
Under last week's settlement signed in Luxembourg, Price Waterhouse will pay $95m, Ernst & Young $30m and Abu Dhabi $70m. The liquidators originally claimed $3.4bn against Ernst & Whinney and £8bn against Price Waterhouse.
A $1.8bn chunk of the claim against Ernst & Whinney was struck out in February 1997 but was reinstated by the Court of Appeal a year later. A further $800m of the claim was struck out in March this year.
It is understood that around 18 months ago, while Ernst & Young was litigating, lawyers at Price Waterhouse's Herbert Smith had begun talking to Lovells about a settlement.
Herbert Smith's team knew they would not be able to settle without getting Ernst & Young to contribute, so Linklaters' Turnbull was approached this April and agreement in principle was reached. Turnbull said the settlement arose mainly because both sides got tired: "It was turning into a WWI-style battle of attrition. Both sides were lobbing some pretty heavy artillery at each other and were suffering heavy losses."
He explained: "The liquidators realised we weren't going to be a pushover and that it was going to cost literally tens of millions of pounds to take it to trial. The trial wasn't scheduled until 2005."
He said Ernst & Young's payment of $30m was less than it would have cost the firm to fight the case to the end.