The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A professional negligence barrister is seeking leave to appeal to the House of Lords to overturn a finding of negligence against her.
The Lords' appellate committee will decide whether Jacqueline Perry of Lamb Chambers misadvised client David Moy in his compensation claim against a local health authority. The court of appeal ruled against her in June 2002.
It is the first case where a barrister has been found negligent for advice given in relation to a settlement offer made at the door of court. Perry denies liability on these grounds and disputes a costs order against her. She has instructed legendary silk Sir Sydney Kentridge QC to handle her appeal.
Perry advised Moy that he could be awarded £210,000 compensation if certain medical evidence was admitted. However, following decisions by a district judge and a circuit judge on appeal of rejecting his application for disclosure, it emerged that Perry had considered that this application had only a 50 per cent chance of success. Perry failed to disclose this to her client.
Perry subsequently advised Moy to reject a £150,000 offer of settlement made by the health authority. She later advised him to accept but the offer was withdrawn. As a result Moy had to make do with an award of £120,000, out of which he would have to pay both sides' costs.
Moy subsequently sued Perry's law firm Pettman Smith, advised by 4 New Square's Bernard Livesey QC, which was found liable, and Perry herself, who was acquitted. The appeal court then upheld Pettman Smith's claim that Perry was liable for half the £210,000 damages facing Pettman Smith.