The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A row has broken out between the Bar Council and a television writer over the BBC courtroom drama, Criminal Justice.
The five-part serial, aired on BBC1 this week, shows the story of a man falsely accused and imprisoned on murder charges.
Bar Council chairman Timothy Dutton said it failed to portray the professional obligations defence barristers are under and shows the Bar to be compromising its high ethical standards.
Dutton was particularly upset about a scene which shows a QC encouraging his client to provide a false defence in court.
“Naturally some licence needs to be taken for dramatic purposes. But Criminal Justice goes too far,” he said.
“Criminal justice is not a game and it is a travesty to suggest that practitioners see it in that way.”
The objection has prompted the series writer, Peter Moffat, himself a former barrister, to come out fighting in defence of the programme.
In an open letter Moffat rejected the Council’s criticisms and insisted: “It is absolutely common practice for defendants to be prodded towards giving instruction which suit the best available defence.
“We have an adversarial system. By definition, we are not after the truth in any criminal trial.”