The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has lashed out at the Bar Council’s proposals to limit BVC places in submissions made to the Entry to the Bar working party.
The BSB said that it does not share the Bar Council working group’s view that the over-supply of students on the BVC is of itself a cause for concern.
The BSB does not see how limiting numbers on the BVC would bring any quality or diversity benefits.
Concerns were also raised into a proposal by the working party, which is chaired by Lord Neuberger, to increase the standard of entry to the BVC to a 2:1 degree, “in the absence of firm evidence as to the likely benefits”.
Director of the BSB Mark Stobbs said that the board’s newly established Education & Training Committee was keen to consider the working group’s proposals on quality and access to the profession.
Stobbs added: “We will do so through careful examination of the evidence base for the proposals. We will then use this information to establish the potential nature and case for change.”
A Bar Council spokesman said that limiting BVC places is one of the issues which is being addressed. He added: “The interim report by the working party, however, is not the final outcome and we need to wait for the final report and a definitive answer which we shouldn’t pre-empt.”