The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
THE Bar Council could face a demand from barristers for direct access by the public, partnership between the two arms of the profession and higher court advocacy rights for the employed Bar, if resolutions are passed at its annual general meeting next month.
The Bar Council has already rejected wider direct access.
The partnership question is being considered by James Munby QC's policy unit. Employed Bar groups are waiting for a final decision from the Lord Chancellor on rights of audience.
But if the resolutions are voted in, the Bar Council could be forced to reconsider its stance on these issues.
The resolutions are proposed by Neil Addison, one of the Bar Council's employed Bar representatives, and seconded by barrister Howard Gray of Staple Inn Chambers.
Addison is contacting barristers to encourage them to attend and vote.
Barristers in the Crown Prosecution Service and Government Legal Service, threatened by privatisation, are facing major changes and so are now keen to see greater flexibility given to the profession, Addison says.
Gray says the changes are needed to preserve the independent Bar in the face of competition from solicitor advocates, who now enjoy more freedom than barristers.