Bank Hur By The Lawyer 4 March 2009 10:20 17 December 2015 15:23 Sign in or register to continue reading. It's FREE Sign in Email Password Keep me logged in Forgot your password? Not registered? It's FREE! Register now Register with The Lawyer Anonymous 4 March 2009 at 16:23 Bank Hur I looked at the law report in The Times yesterday, and was staggered by the amount of firepower (and cost) involved, particularly on the banks’ side. Was it really necessary for all the banks to have independent representation on this point of principle? Wasn’t there at least some commonality of interest which could have led them to appoint only one or two firms and barristers’ teams to represent the banks, rather than each having their own separate teams (or possibly even agreeing to be bound by one test case)? How did the barristers find anything different to say from each other? I may be missing something, but this does not look like a clever piece of case management. Reply Link Anonymous 5 March 2009 at 09:39 Cittie of Yorke Good points all. Apart from the bit about the Cittie of Yorke. It’s not opposite the RCJ, it’s on High Holborn. Reply Link Ben Moshinsky 5 March 2009 at 10:03 My mistake That’s a fair point about the Cittie of Yorke. Which pubs do the barristers go to then after a hard day in court? Reply Link Name Email Cancel reply Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.