Baker & McKenzie vs 11-year old in Narnia IP row
Share
A couple from Edinburgh is being threatened with a law suit by Baker & McKenzie over their son’s 11th birthday present.
Gillian Ferguson and Richard Saville-Smith bought the narnia.mobi email domain name in 2006, so that their son, an avid fan of the Chronicles of Narnia books by author CS Lewis, might receive emails at that address direct to his mobile phone.
Richard Saville-Smith said that a firm from England, Ireland and Scotland respectively have offered to assist the Scottish family pro bono, but that while he was grateful for the offers, he was confident that he and his wife could take on Bakers alone.
“Once you get over the initial shock of the complexity of the rules and the number of pages, WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation) rules are fairly clear - the burden of faith is on the them. We’re not being intimidated by the world’s leading law firm.”
Saville-Smith would not name the three firms in question.
However he added that the 128-page legal complaint, prepared by the New York-based partner Lisa W. Rosaya was “not very clever.” He said: “They’re throwing jargon around.”
But Baker & McKenzie, representing the CS Lewis Company, owner of the Narnia author’s estate, claims that the couple acted in “bad faith”.
According to Saville-Smith, the document issued to the couple claims that “the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith”, and “narnia.mobi domain is being used for the Respondent’s commercial gain”. The father denied that he, his wife or son stand to gain commercially from ownership of the domain name.
Saville-Smith pointed out that the CS Lewis Company failed to take advantage of a sunrise period in which to buy up the dot mobi domain name.
“Bakers issued a client alert in 2006 about the dot mobi domain names. They had a three-month period to buy it and they screwed up. If they do take my son’s domain name away we’ll go through this all again.”
Baker & McKenzie declined to comment.
View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page
Readers' comments (22)
Anon | 16-Jun-2008 4:17 pm
Bullies
As I understand it, the people who registered the domain name in Scotland are just Narnia fans and hobbyists, there’s no evidence of anything that amounts to abuse. There are many homage and fan sites. To me it sounds like Baker & McKenzie might have jumped the gun. Sometimes a rather heavy-handed approach is taken right away when the other side is considered ‘bulliable’. It could be that with a gentle-handed approach one could solve it.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Ben Williams | 16-Jun-2008 6:56 pm
Pro Bono
Is there any truth in the rumours that Aslan & Overy are offering some pro bono representation?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Gerry Peters | 16-Jun-2008 7:08 pm
Prince Caspian would not be impressed.
It would seem to me that if the C.S.Lewis estate can afford to hire a law firm to write a 128 page legal document explaining to an 11 year old boy that he is trying to profit at their expense, could surely hire someone for a lot less money to keep their domain names in order.
The profit to me is from the 11 year olds that buy the books and watch the movies for which you should be grateful.
Until the first movie it was rare for me to find anything on a book shelf relating to Narnia. Now all of a sudden because of profit we now see the estate for what it is. Here is another prime example of how to twart a childs dream, good show, I'm impressed.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
James, Bristol | 16-Jun-2008 7:09 pm
Suggestion
Perhaps they should get some help from White Witch & Case.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Michael Thouless | 16-Jun-2008 10:48 pm
Baker & McKenzie vs 11-year old in Narnia IP
I would have to ask; if the bullies are to be believed they failed or were too arrogant to pay the £70.00 themselves. Now if an organisation the size of the CS Lewis Company cannot put there hand in there pocket or the petty cash box for this piffling amount they do not deserve to own this name. Let their arrogance be a lesson to all bullies.
Legitimately purchased in the open, my vote is for the boy/father to be declared the rightful owners. Let us see if the governing body has the courage to support the minnows.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
SVU | 17-Jun-2008 7:26 am
Only claiming to act in good faith
Well, a quick look at the actual content of the web-site in question does not really support the position taken by the Scottish familty in this case. It doesn't look like your typical fan site.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17-Jun-2008 7:43 am
Plonkers
128 page submissions.. sounds like approximately £3000 of work to me. Add on initial advice to clients and it is probably £4000-5000 spent already.
If the kid is a Narnia fan then I would imagine tickets to the world premier and a shed-load of goodies would have been enough to secure transfer.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Anonymous | 17-Jun-2008 9:30 am
Good story
I thought the defendant seemed pretty clued up until he described Baker & McKenzie as the world's leading law firm...
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Lucy | 17-Jun-2008 10:41 am
Quite
Can't agree with the last post ('Plonkers') more. Very tactless of both the CS Lewis estate and Bakers to have taken the scary lawyer route, and not very cost effective either. They should have just offered him some Turkish delight.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Leo | 17-Jun-2008 10:44 am
Aslan
Have you ever seen Susan Aslan? Very appropriately, she's bright orange and has a mane. Like Gerry Halliwell crossed with Lionoe from Thundercats.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment