Baker & McKenzie vs 11-year old in Narnia IP row

  • Print
  • Comments (22)

Readers' comments (22)

  • Bullies

    As I understand it, the people who registered the domain name in Scotland are just Narnia fans and hobbyists, there’s no evidence of anything that amounts to abuse. There are many homage and fan sites. To me it sounds like Baker & McKenzie might have jumped the gun. Sometimes a rather heavy-handed approach is taken right away when the other side is considered ‘bulliable’. It could be that with a gentle-handed approach one could solve it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pro Bono

    Is there any truth in the rumours that Aslan & Overy are offering some pro bono representation?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Prince Caspian would not be impressed.

    It would seem to me that if the C.S.Lewis estate can afford to hire a law firm to write a 128 page legal document explaining to an 11 year old boy that he is trying to profit at their expense, could surely hire someone for a lot less money to keep their domain names in order.

    The profit to me is from the 11 year olds that buy the books and watch the movies for which you should be grateful.

    Until the first movie it was rare for me to find anything on a book shelf relating to Narnia. Now all of a sudden because of profit we now see the estate for what it is. Here is another prime example of how to twart a childs dream, good show, I'm impressed.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Suggestion

    Perhaps they should get some help from White Witch & Case.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Baker & McKenzie vs 11-year old in Narnia IP

    I would have to ask; if the bullies are to be believed they failed or were too arrogant to pay the £70.00 themselves. Now if an organisation the size of the CS Lewis Company cannot put there hand in there pocket or the petty cash box for this piffling amount they do not deserve to own this name. Let their arrogance be a lesson to all bullies.

    Legitimately purchased in the open, my vote is for the boy/father to be declared the rightful owners. Let us see if the governing body has the courage to support the minnows.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Only claiming to act in good faith

    Well, a quick look at the actual content of the web-site in question does not really support the position taken by the Scottish familty in this case. It doesn't look like your typical fan site.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Plonkers

    128 page submissions.. sounds like approximately £3000 of work to me. Add on initial advice to clients and it is probably £4000-5000 spent already.

    If the kid is a Narnia fan then I would imagine tickets to the world premier and a shed-load of goodies would have been enough to secure transfer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Good story

    I thought the defendant seemed pretty clued up until he described Baker & McKenzie as the world's leading law firm...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Quite

    Can't agree with the last post ('Plonkers') more. Very tactless of both the CS Lewis estate and Bakers to have taken the scary lawyer route, and not very cost effective either. They should have just offered him some Turkish delight.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Aslan

    Have you ever seen Susan Aslan? Very appropriately, she's bright orange and has a mane. Like Gerry Halliwell crossed with Lionoe from Thundercats.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page

Have your say

Mandatory Required Fields

Mandatory

Comments that are in breach or potential breach of our terms and conditions in particular clause 8, may not be published or, if published, may subsequently be taken down. In addition we may remove any comment where a complaint is made in respect of it. These actions are at our sole discretion.

  • Print
  • Comments (22)