The Lawyer’s new China Elite report contains the most detailed research available on the PRC legal market and contains unparalleled insight into the country's leading law firms. They vary in size, practice focus and geographic coverage, but they all share one common quality – ambition... Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
A leaked internal memo has exposed the scale of anger over DLA Piper’s job-cutting programme, with employees confronting senior staff about the redundancy ;packages offered by the firm.
As revealed on The Lawyer.com (11 March), minutes from a meeting held last month, after the firm announced it was to lose 30 lawyers and 110 support staff, showed office managing partner Catherine Usher fielding angry questions ;about ;the compensation being offered.
Unlike firms including Clifford ;Chance ;and Linklaters, DLA Piper has offered the statutory minimum to departing staff.
One employee at the meeting described the package as an insult, saying: “I’m not sure you appreciate the level of anger on the floors.” Others asked why partners had not been affected.
Those who take voluntary redundancy will receive their contractual notice period, ;the ;statutory redundancy payment and one month’s salary.
The minutes also revealed that a recruitment freeze had been in place since June 2008. The hiring freeze is understood to exclude newly qualified lawyers and ‘essential roles’.
HR staff told the meeting that, in a bid to lower costs, since June last year 100 employees had left the firm, with only 26 per cent of the vacancies being filled.
The 30-day consultation ends on 20 March. A DLA Piper spokesman said: “We’ve ;engaged ;in ;a thorough process, which in two of our offices has included a formal collective consultation ;process, including the election of workplace representatives. The representatives have added to the debate and we’d like to thank them for their contributions.”