The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
South East firm ASB Law is facing a £100,000 negligence claim brought by a former client of the firm's personal injury department.
Elaine Fairfax instructed ASB in relation to a claim she brought against hardware retailer B&Q when she hurt her back in one of its stores. ASB won £11,000 in damages and £18,000 in costs from B&Q, but according to her claim, Fairfax argues that she could have received damages of more than £200,000.
ASB first issued a claim against B&Q for between £5,000 and £15,000. However, after the claim was filed, Fairfax and her husband's business hit financial difficulties, and she took a job in London, which further aggravated her injury.
ASB then wrote to B&Q's law firm Berrymans, saying it wished to increase the maximum damages and claim for future loss of earnings. Although there was correspondence from Berryman's, it made no reference to the prospect of an amended schedule.
At the hearing Judge Lloyd refused the claimant permission to rely upon the amended schedule of loss.
In the latest claim Fairfax says that ASB acted negligently and is now seeking an award which accounts for the full extent of damages, as well as seeking damages for distress, anxiety and disappointment from the firm.
"It's not our practice to comment on any claims that are made against the firm," said ASB chief executive Christopher Honeyman Brown.