The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
The Legal Services Board (LSB) has published research into aptitude testing as a method for selecting students onto the Legal Practice Course (LPC) and Bar Professional Training Course.
The research report, prepared by Dr Chris Dewberry of Birkbeck College and published this week, explored whether such tests could help enhance diversity and fair access to the profession by testing the potential of aspiring lawyers on a “level playing field” where inequalities in previous academic achievements are irrelevant.
It concluded that compared to many other methods and techniques which can be used to select people for educational programmes, training courses, and jobs, cognitive ability tests and aptitude tests have a number of advantages. For example, they can be taken quickly, online, and at remote locations, with a large number of candidates assessed simultaneously.
However, the report also identified a number of problems with aptitude testing including most notably the fact that results from the test can be construed as more precise and accurate than they actually are. Additionally, the author raised major fears over a reduction in diversity as students from privileged backgrounds tend to perform better than others on aptitude tests.
College of Law’s chief executive Nigel Savage who is strongly opposed to the introduction of an LPC aptitude test said: “I instinctively don’t like artificial barriers being introduced to anything. What’s more this report doesn’t establish beyond reasonable doubt the need for an aptitude test.”