The Lawyer Asia Pacific 150 is the only research report to provide a ranking of the top 100 independent local firms and top 50 global firms in the region. The report offers critical review of some of the fastest growing firms and their strategies, a country-by-country guide to leading legal advisers and legal services market trends, plus exclusive insight into the current business development opportunities in the Asia Pacific. Read more
This year, The Lawyer’s annual ranking of the largest UK law firms by turnover is available as an interactive, digital benchmarking tool. For the first time this will allow you to manipulate each data set against the metrics of your choice.
High Court judge Mr Justice Peter Smith has slammed the Court of Appeal for its level of intervention in the case management ;of ;long commercial trials.
In a speech to the London Solicitors ;Litigation Association’s (LSLA) annual dinner last Tuesday (18 November), Smith J said the appeal court had “failed to engage with High Court judges”, adding that “out-of-touch” appeal judges are to blame for the reoccurrence of long trials.
Smith J’s statements echo the findings of the Commercial Court Long Trials Working Party report, which stated: “There were some who argued that appellate courts are far too ready to interfere with a commercial judge’s view on whether there should be summary judgment of a claim or whether it should be struck out.”
But the judge’s speech went further than the report, as he criticised the Court of Appeal for interfering with different types of finding of fact at trial when it came to a full appeal hearing.
One ;litigator ;who attended the LSLA event said Smith J’s comments were “fiery”.
“At the time it seemed Peter Smith’s comments were a little close to the bone,” said the lawyer. “On reflection, though, it’s gratifying that, on the whole, he’s thinking along the same lines as the working party.”